It's convenient.Īlso, vis-a-vis assembling/Word, I'd say that using Master Documents would solve a LOT of authors' issues, if they are building a massive story/storyworld, and are working one chapter at a time. But, again, I absolutely understand why some folks like it. I feel that there's not really any difference between keeping a folder on a computer, versus keeping the folders at the "bottom" of the Scrivener file list. Sure you can do that manually in Word but it is a built-in for me, the sub-resource information "folders" are simply convenience, rather than anything special. Same for document snapshots, backing up your work to explore different revisions. I think you're downplaying some of Scrivener's abilities but I can understand how it isn't everyone's cup of tea.Īlso Scrivener allows one file to maintain resource sub-information much more easily, and separately assemble your text document, than inserting it into one Word file. Even that combination doesn't have the character or story hand-holding that some of your preferred applications provide.
Www awa compass com for mac#
The latest MS Office365 for Mac is weak, after all their improvements.
Scrivener for Mac is better than the other combinations I've tried in OSX (Circus Ponies Notebook, Growley Notes, and OneNote for Mac).
Www awa compass com windows#
Working purely in Windows I prefer a combination of Word and OneNote, which still doesn't have the easy one-file approach of Scrivener. Sure you can do that manually in Word but it is a built-in for Scrivener. Word's outline capability is not nearly as visual as Scivener's, with the ability to add colors and status words to each block of text (normally scenes but you can subdivide at whatever level you prefer).Īlso Scrivener allows one file to maintain resource sub-information much more easily, and separately assemble your text document, than inserting it into one Word file. Stuff like adding notes and tags to scenes, separate from all-document notes and tags. #66 Penforhire 08-08-2015, 03:49 PMHitch, on Scrivener, Word does not have the same structural capability.
0 kommentar(er)
